Richardville: Senate Republicans are not “pro-bullying”

Listening to Senate GOP leader Randy Richardville talk about the Senate Republicans is like listening to the Iraqi Information Minister talk about the Republican Guard.

##“The Republican** Guard is in full control.

##The Republican** caucus is not “pro-bullying.” (MIRS, 11/14/11)

Hmm. Denial much?

For those who are unaware, Senate Republicans recently passed an “anti-bullying” bill that allows religious and moral exceptions. In other words, if you believe Jesus is telling you to beat the hell out of the girly boy sitting next to you in class, then Senate Republicans want to make sure you have the right to express that belief. The consequences of this proposed legislation are clear:

##The religious / moral exception adds legitimacy to their crazy contingent who kill people. The Republican Party of Michigan is sympathetic to violence done in the name of religious and moral convictions. Dr. Tiller’s assassination is an example of these right-wingers who feel that their moral convictions are more important than another person’s life.

##The bill would strengthen the GOP architecture of law based on socially conservative religion.

##The bill refuses to recognize vulnerable groups such as lgbt youth, on the basis that there should not be a special rule for the lgbt population. (Which is interesting, since the lgbt population has special rules for things like marriage and health benefits.)

##The bill comes after House GOP Rep Tom McMillin introduced a bill that would prevent local municipality and school districts from having civil rights laws that are more expansive than state law. By carving out the religious exception AND denying the high risk level of lgbt youth, the Senate Republicans seek to built a state where no level of local authority could protect lgbt citizens against religious harassment.

When called out on the legislation by Gretchen Whitmer and the other Dems, Richardville had this to say:

“I guess she needs some media, because obviously, no one in this caucus is pro-bullying and to suggest that means you just need attention. But being defeated as badly as they were in the last election, probably is part of that. … it’s a typical minority strategy and when you’re in the minority — a superminority — I guess you have to do something to get attention”

(emphasis (and indignation) mine)

So there you have it. There’s nothing wrong with the legislation. It’s just that Democrats don’t like the moral exception because we’re the minority party.

Republican Senators are not “pro-bullying” in the same way that they are not anti-black, anti-hispanic, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-education, anti-worker, anti-environment, anti-muslim, and anti-science. We know this because they tell us that it’s obvious.

Well my Republican friends, I do not believe that word means what you think it means.

**It’s just a coincidence. Really.

There are no cover bands in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Follow me on Twitter - @christinebarry
Christine
View all posts by Christine   
Christine Website   
  • Fuzzy Slippers

    Senator Richardville is OBVIOUSLY feeling a bit emasculated by the fact that 12 people being led by a WOMAN stuck to their guns and gained attention because they were RIGHT on an issue.

    You know, that and he can’t control his committee chairs (as evidenced by the shell-games he has to play with assigning bills to committees in order to ensure they are ever seen again), he totally biffed on the Governor’s pet bridge project, had to practically stand on his members’ throats to get them to vote for the pension tax. A move that will cost him.

    Besides, he’s been sniping at his own Committee Chairs for being press-hungry lately, too. During the bridge debacle a few weeks back he made the same “he loves the attention” comments about Senator Mike Kowall.

    Sounds like Randy’s just a bit jealous. Having a Republican House makes the Republican leader in the Senate not so much a household word as his predecessor was.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://liberalmedianot.blogspot.com Communications Guru

    I agree. I don’t think there’s anyone in Lansing with a bigger ego. Just make sure you don’t get between the Majority Leader and a camera or a reporter or you could get trampled. It’s clear he has lost control of his caucus. After the bridge debacle that has so much bipartisan support he said he was throwing in the towel after Republicans killed it in committee.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://bloggingformichigan.com Communications Guru

    LBGT groups were made an exception under the Senate version; they made it OK. The simple fact is enumeration makes the law stronger. The LBGT community has never asked for any special rights; just the same ones everybody else gets.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0